en
en
as Real Founder Skin in the Game
Founder contribution — what investors evaluate and why it matters
Investing isn’t about a taste for risk — it’s about returns and disciplined risk management. If the founder has no personal stake, the basic alignment test (skin in the game) fails: incentives diverge, spending discipline becomes questionable, and the risk of long, aimless “pivots for the sake of pivoting” increases. Below is what investors classify as actual founder participation, what scale is considered reasonable, how to document it, how to demonstrate commitment when personal cash is limited, which investor protections are market-standard, the most common mistakes, and why “the idea itself” never qualifies as skin in the game.
Skin in the game is personal capital already at risk — something with monetary value that can be lost and is supported by documents:
What doesn’t count as skin: an idea without a prototype and source files, “evenings and weekends” work with no artifacts, asking the investor to prepay preparation, success-fee-only vendors for core preparation work.
When the founder has personal money and assets at stake, there is a real “cost of failure.” This lowers the risk of budget creep and endless experimentation. It also sends a credible signal of conviction: if the founder isn’t willing to take risk themselves, why should the investor?
Investing is not about “loving risk”; it’s about achieving returns through control. Personal contribution aligns incentives: in failure both sides lose, in success both sides win.
Market practice focuses on magnitude, not “sacred numbers.” At early stages, a healthy founder contribution equals roughly 10–30% of the round’s needs or 2–6 months of projected post-money burn.
This contribution typically includes a mix of cash and capitalized assets: cash 30–60%, the rest in IP, licenses, equipment, or documented deferred compensation. Any founder loans must be subordinated — repayment after the investor, with no immediate refinancing from invested funds.
Example: if the post-money burn is €60–70k per month, skin in the range of €100–300k (cash + assets) signals discipline.
Break the raise into several steps. Two or three tranches tied to measurable milestones and short execution windows allow the founder to demonstrate commitment gradually while reducing uncertainty as progress is delivered.
A solid sequence: paid pilots → revenue and customer retention (MRR, churn, CAC payback) → key feature release or regulatory checkpoint.
Each milestone should have a 4–6 month window; before the next step — a short review with evidence.
Strengthen your position with assets and rights. Assign code and designs to the company, attach proof of costs and a simple valuation. Provide paid patents, licenses, certifications. Add transfer acts for equipment and software. This turns “trust me” into documented evidence.
Document deferred compensation: what portion is accrued but unpaid, which KPIs unlock payment or conversion to equity, and junior priority relative to the investor. This demonstrates both personal financial risk and compensation discipline.
Add a partner before the investor. Not a “contractor for equity,” but a minority shareholder or co-founder who contributes cash, IP, or equipment — under the same rules: vesting, reporting, no refinancing of past expenses. This strengthens your signal rather than substituting for it.
Use debt without toxicity. A subordinated founder loan shows commitment. Interest is symbolic and repayment comes after the investor or through conversion. Nobody wants debt structures that choke future rounds, so terms must be moderate and transparent.
Spread capex over time. Leasing and supplier installment plans reduce upfront cash burden but formalize skin in contracts and payments. This is standard practice. “Decorative escrow” isn’t necessary: if you have resources, deploy them directly and document it.
Co-funding programs and grants: your mandatory co-payments count as personal risk if supported with receipts and documents. Grants provide external validation but don’t replace founder discipline.
This is your mandate and your obligation. Preparing the financial model, roadmap, legal base, data room, and term sheet is your responsibility. For the company, these are accounts payable incurred before investment. Asking the investor to cover your past obligations is a poor governance signal.
Prepare a concise contribution register: date, category, amount, form (cash, IP, asset, deferral), and link to documentation.
For cash — bank statements, invoices, contracts, transfer confirmations.
For IP and assets — assignment agreements, asset-transfer acts, registers, simple valuation.
For licenses/certifications — receipts, regulatory decisions, reports.
For deferred comp — addenda specifying accrued but unpaid amounts, KPIs for release or conversion, junior priority, accumulation limit, and deadline.
A clean documentation set removes “opinion versus opinion” arguments and saves hours of explanations.
Use of funds: explicitly prohibit refinancing past founder expenses. Consultant payments post-investment must follow the roadmap.
Founder loans: subordinated; 0–2% interest; repaid after the investor or converted under a clear formula.
Reserved matters: issuance of new shares (except planned ESOP), new debt above a threshold, asset transactions, M&A, changes in control.
Reporting and limits: monthly key metrics (revenue, retention, burn/runway, sales funnel); quarterly P&L and cash flow. Reasonable caps on unplanned capex and hiring.
Priorities and anti-dilution: 1× non-participating liquidation preference — the investor receives either their money back or converts, whichever is better. No double-dipping. Anti-dilution — weighted-average to avoid distorting future rounds.
No. An idea becomes real skin only once it transforms into a verifiable asset with cost and downside exposure: a working prototype with source files, patent filings with paid fees, certifications, signed letters of intent or pre-orders with payments, real contractor invoices. Before that point — zero balance-sheet value and no personal financial vulnerability.
Skin in the game isn’t about heroics — it’s about symmetry of responsibility and operational discipline. A founder who has already invested personal capital and assets, documented everything properly, and isn’t trying to shift baseline risk onto investors or vendors earns a substantive conversation and market-standard terms. This is visible in numbers and documents — not slogans — and that’s what convinces investors.